Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These We Energies results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 63.9% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,862 of 20,226 speakers). This We Energies is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
We Energies
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠76%We Energies (selected)67%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos