Author summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video1,209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin Watch results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 483 hits. Analysis detected 2,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (3,666 of 5,088 authors). This Wisconsin Watch is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Wisconsin Watch
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠28%Wisconsin Watch (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,836
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wisconsin Watch attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wisconsin Watch vs sitewide
Wisconsin Watch attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos