Publication summary
⁠5%2 analyzed articles/videos1,908 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin Watch results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 691 hits. Analysis detected 3,942 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,632 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (190 of 296 publications). This Wisconsin Watch is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Wisconsin Watch
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%San Francisco Chronicle1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠1%Houston Chronicle1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠2%The Colorado Sun1%
⁠36%Wisconsin Watch (selected)2%
⁠99%Decatur Daily9%
⁠99%The White House9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 7,632
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wisconsin Watch attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wisconsin Watch vs sitewide
Wisconsin Watch attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos