Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video35 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UTS results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Optimism Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 54.3% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 35 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (11,838 of 44,887 speakers). This UTS is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
UTS
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠74%UTS (selected)52%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 35
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.6% percentile
51.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos35 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 54.3%54.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 45.7%45.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 54.3%54.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 54.3%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 54.3%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 45.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos