Speaker summary
30%2 analyzed articles/videos57.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University of Texas at Arlington results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 34.6% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 148 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 34.6% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,045 of 35,293 speakers). This University of Texas at Arlington is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
University of Texas at Arlington
Speaker details