Speaker summary
â 86%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tree conservation groups results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Nature as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of â 84% (3,949 of 24,545 speakers). This Tree conservation groups is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Tree conservation groups
Speaker details