Author summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camellia Burris results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 1,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,355 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (2,692 of 5,949 authors). This Camellia Burris is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Camellia Burris
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠55%Camellia Burris (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,355
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Camellia Burris attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Camellia Burris vs sitewide
Camellia Burris attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos