Speaker summary
50%6 analyzed articles/videos648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Holland results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 1,487.222 faulty-reasoning hits from 648 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,214 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Holland is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group.
Tom Holland