Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video64.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiffany Bohm results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 64.5 hits. Analysis detected 150.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 64.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (9,346 of 45,656 speakers). This Tiffany Bohm is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Tiffany Bohm
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠80%Tiffany Bohm (selected)67%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 64.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.5% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos64.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos