Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video55.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The New Humanitarian results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 111 faulty-reasoning hits from 55.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (4,115 of 19,396 speakers). This The New Humanitarian is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
The New Humanitarian
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠79%The New Humanitarian (selected)75%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 55.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos

How David Miliband failed upwards⁠62%
UnHerd⁠77%By Ian Birrell⁠82%7/14/2026, 11:03:31 PM