Author summary
ā 81%1 analyzed article/video2,012 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Birrell results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 2,509 hits. Analysis detected 11,641 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ā 64% (1,782 of 4,954 authors). This Ian Birrell is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Ian Birrell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
ā 1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
ā 1%Joe Rennison1%
ā 64%Ian Birrell (selected)4%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,048
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ian Birrell attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ian Birrell vs sitewide
Ian Birrell attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

How David Miliband failed upwardsā 62%
UnHerdā 77%By Ian Birrellā 81%7/14/2026, 11:03:31 PM