Speaker summary
27%3 analyzed articles/videos81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TEA results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 27 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of 41% (16,956 of 28,364 speakers). This TEA is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
TEA
Speaker details
Total words: 81
Article count: 3
Authors