BS Summary: These Rebekah F. Ward results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 617 hits. Analysis detected 3,742 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (1,614 of 4,737 authors). This Rebekah F. Ward is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Rebekah F. Ward
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Sophia Gates0%
⁠0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
⁠0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
⁠1%Sergey Radchenko0%
⁠1%Robert Lloyd0%
⁠66%Rebekah F. Ward (selected)4%
⁠100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
⁠100%Alex Horton56%
⁠100%Zahara Hill58%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
⁠100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 3,788
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Rebekah F. Ward attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Rebekah F. Ward vs All Other Publications
Rebekah F. Ward attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.