Speaker summary
ā 90%1 analyzed article/video23 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tavernetta results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 46 faulty-reasoning hits from 23 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 87% (5,364 of 39,194 speakers). This Tavernetta is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Tavernetta
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Conor Heffernan1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 87%Tavernetta (selected)100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%2035 Initiative100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
ā 100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 23
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

86% percentile
025507510086.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos23 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos