Author summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video458 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antony Bruno results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 1,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (2,375 of 8,551 authors). This Antony Bruno is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Antony Bruno
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠73%Antony Bruno (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,832
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos