Speaker summary
42%1 analyzed article/video274.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Mandernach results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 64.5 hits. Analysis detected 285.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 274.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (39,709 of 42,729 speakers). This Steven Mandernach is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Steven Mandernach
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
8%Steven Mandernach (selected)8%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 274.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.1% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos274.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos