Speaker summary
49%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sick of It All results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 64.587 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (21,657 of 40,165 speakers). This Sick of It All is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Sick of It All
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
47%Sick of It All (selected)28%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
27.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 38.4%38.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos