Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video828.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shawn Carney results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 145.907 hits. Analysis detected 1,257.169 faulty-reasoning hits from 828.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (44,069 of 45,120 speakers). This Shawn Carney is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
Shawn Carney
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠3%Shawn Carney (selected)5%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 828.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.3% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos828.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 9.6%9.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos