Speaker summary
⁠64%3 analyzed articles/videos327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shannon Bennett results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 89.279 hits. Analysis detected 535.643 faulty-reasoning hits from 327 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (41,135 of 45,145 speakers). This Shannon Bennett is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group.
Shannon Bennett
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠9%Shannon Bennett (selected)9%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 327
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751008.9% percentile
8.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos327 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 25.5%25.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.3%8.3%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos