Speaker summary
88%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Surovell results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 33.75 hits. Analysis detected 93.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (7,282 of 28,364 speakers). This Scott Surovell is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Scott Surovell
Speaker details