Speaker summary
85%1 analyzed article/video279 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Presler results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 44.4% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 460.811 faulty-reasoning hits from 279 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (35,568 of 45,123 speakers). This Scott Presler is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Scott Presler
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
22%Scott Presler (selected)14%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 279
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.2% percentile
13.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos279 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 44.4%44.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.8%13.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos