Speaker summary
89%1 analyzed article/video82.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Hanselman results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 165 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of 77% (4,933 of 20,824 speakers). This Scott Hanselman is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Scott Hanselman
Speaker details