Speaker summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Blanton results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 55 hits . Analysis detected 285.555 faulty-reasoning hits from 142 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.9% and a BS Rank of 31% (31,005 of 44,408 speakers). This Sarah Blanton is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Sarah Blanton
Speaker details
Total words: 142
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 17.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos142 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 28.4% 28.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 27.6% 27.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 16.5% 16.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 16.5% 16.5% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 16.5% 16.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 16.5% 16.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anecdotal: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 3.3% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst