Speaker summary
56%1 analyzed article/video66.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert S. Warshaw results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 43% saturation with 32.242 hits. Analysis detected 104.083 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.4% and a BS Rank of 47% (15,057 of 28,364 speakers). This Robert S. Warshaw is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Robert S. Warshaw
Speaker details