Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video43.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raymond Santiago results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 184.465 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 73.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (7,298 of 38,481 speakers). This Raymond Santiago is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Raymond Santiago
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠81%Raymond Santiago (selected)74%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 43.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos