Author summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video1,436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 532 hits. Analysis detected 3,225 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (4,251 of 6,740 authors). This Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠37%Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,744
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg vs sitewide
Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos