Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philip Prince results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,453 of 19,168 speakers). This Philip Prince is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Philip Prince
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠88%Philip Prince (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos