Speaker summary
78%1 analyzed article/video2,189.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Stanford results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 450.096 hits. Analysis detected 3,393.904 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,189.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (28,024 of 28,364 speakers). This Phil Stanford is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Phil Stanford
Speaker details