Speaker summary
90%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pew Charitable Trusts results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 24 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,954 of 23,859 speakers). This Pew Charitable Trusts is worse (more manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
Pew Charitable Trusts
Speaker details