Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video49 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Van Buren results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 58.7% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 49 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,916 of 28,364 speakers). This Peter Van Buren is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Peter Van Buren
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠62%Peter Van Buren (selected)45%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 49
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos