Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video44.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedro Viloria results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 116 faulty-reasoning hits from 44.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,845 of 28,364 speakers). This Pedro Viloria is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Pedro Viloria
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠73%Pedro Viloria (selected)54%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 44.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos