Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paxton’s campaign results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,818 of 22,687 speakers). This Paxton’s campaign is worse (more manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
Paxton’s campaign
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠88%Paxton’s campaign (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 16
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos