Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Taylor Goldenstein results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 2,366 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,157 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 5,694 authors). This Taylor Goldenstein is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Taylor Goldenstein
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Taylor Goldenstein attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Taylor Goldenstein vs sitewide
Taylor Goldenstein attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.