Speaker summary
84%1 analyzed article/video129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Infurna results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 336.683 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,608 of 28,364 speakers). This Patrick Infurna is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Patrick Infurna
Speaker details