Speaker summary
73%1 analyzed article/video89.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Berger results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 89.3% saturation with 93.353 hits. Analysis detected 345.353 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.5% and a BS Rank of 72% (8,096 of 28,364 speakers). This Noah Berger is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Noah Berger
Speaker details