Speaker summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos37.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Tran results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 6 hits. Analysis detected 6 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (35,554 of 43,005 speakers). This Nina Tran is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Nina Tran
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠18%Nina Tran (selected)12%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 37.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
12.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos37.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos