Author summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Tran results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 999 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (4,168 of 8,290 authors). This Nina Tran is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Nina Tran
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠50%Nina Tran (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,288
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nina Tran attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nina Tran vs sitewide
Nina Tran attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos