Speaker summary
56%1 analyzed article/video247.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Chapman results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Pessimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 92.153 hits. Analysis detected 669.452 faulty-reasoning hits from 247.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,258 of 28,364 speakers). This Neil Chapman is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Neil Chapman
Speaker details