Speaker summary
61%1 analyzed article/video60.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Institute on Aging results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 71.4% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 78 faulty-reasoning hits from 60.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (13,727 of 28,364 speakers). This National Institute on Aging is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
National Institute on Aging
Speaker details