Speaker summary
53%7 analyzed articles/videos497.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Hochman results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 1,681.657 faulty-reasoning hits from 497.667 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (24,929 of 28,364 speakers). This Nathan Hochman is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Nathan Hochman