Speaker summary
53%4 analyzed articles/videos238.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nate Swanson results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 48.4% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 613.408 faulty-reasoning hits from 238.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of 16% (22,593 of 26,731 speakers). This Nate Swanson is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Nate Swanson