Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video74.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Green results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Unattributed Quote, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 69.6% saturation with 58.5 hits. Analysis detected 181.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 74.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,912 of 28,364 speakers). This Natalie Green is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Natalie Green
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠48%Natalie Green (selected)30%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 74.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos