Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MPA members results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (4,177 of 44,299 speakers). This MPA members is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
MPA members
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠91%MPA members (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510090.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos