Author summary
83%5 analyzed articles/videos570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Channa Steinmetz results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 341 hits. Analysis detected 3,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,508 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (4,696 of 8,790 authors). This Channa Steinmetz is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Channa Steinmetz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
47%Channa Steinmetz (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,508
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate