Speaker summary
66%1 analyzed article/video35.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miriam Helfgott results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 98.1% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 95.89 faulty-reasoning hits from 35.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 48% and a BS Rank of 64% (10,403 of 28,364 speakers). This Miriam Helfgott is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Miriam Helfgott
Speaker details