Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Casca results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 79.8% saturation with 132.541 hits. Analysis detected 402.541 faulty-reasoning hits from 166 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (11,790 of 45,124 speakers). This Mike Casca is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Mike Casca
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠74%Mike Casca (selected)52%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 166
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
52.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos166 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 79.8%79.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 42.6%42.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 42.6%42.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 42.6%42.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ad Hominem: Speaker 79.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos