Author summary
⁠61%2 analyzed articles/videos3,090 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan J. Robinson results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 1,085 hits. Analysis detected 8,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,666 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (6,581 of 8,355 authors). This Nathan J. Robinson is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Nathan J. Robinson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠22%Nathan J. Robinson (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,666
Article count: 2
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nathan J. Robinson attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nathan J. Robinson vs sitewide
Nathan J. Robinson attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos