Speaker summary
52%5 analyzed articles/videos2,350.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Farrell results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Ad Hominem, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 297.165 hits. Analysis detected 3,619.432 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,350.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,181 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Farrell is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Michael Farrell
Speaker details