Speaker summary
92%1 analyzed article/video88.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mel Lorentz results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 88.5 hits. Analysis detected 265.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 88.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (6,635 of 27,781 speakers). This Mel Lorentz is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Mel Lorentz
Speaker details