Author summary
ā 6%1 analyzed article/video834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Hazzard results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Overconfidence Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 1,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ā 16% (4,113 of 4,887 authors). This Andrew Hazzard is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
Andrew Hazzard
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
ā 1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
ā 1%Joe Rennison1%
ā 16%Andrew Hazzard (selected)2%
ā 100%Daniel Arkin38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,336
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Andrew Hazzard attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Andrew Hazzard vs sitewide
Andrew Hazzard attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos